Superior Court of California - County of San Diego
Case Number 23-O-22905
Commission Ernest M, Gross
CASE NUMBER 22SC00127C / 22SC1630C
I sued Smart Corner and ACE’S because they harassed me verbally and towed my car in handicap aggressive. I rent parking three months. They didn’t want to resolve law intimidating bullying disregard of California and Federal law. STATE OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION. 22511.5 - 22511.8.
They (Smart Corner Owners, SDHC, ACE’S) didn’t care for law because they have bias and dishonest, abused Commissioner Ernest M. Gross at Court SD-63 Small Claims. They could do anything Smart Corner 1080 Park Blvd and SDHC 1125 Broadway San Diego but court small claims unfair Ernest M. Gross support and encourage disabilities harassment.
November,16 2022 Case #22SC00127C Commissioner Ernest M. Gross hearing. I didn’t mail the exhibit for ten days but I have my exhibit in court. Commissioner Ernest M. Gross wants my folder exhibited. Commissioner Ernest M. Gross sees my handicapped blue plaque, nothing else and I cannot see my papers, it is on the judge bench. I have a stroke and aphasia. I cannot speak well. Commissioner Ernest M. Gross Intimidating and unfair, bias ,prejudice. He said law C.V.C towed handicapped towed cars. This is not true in the law STATE OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION. 22511.5 - 22511.8.
Commissioner Ernest M. Gross scolded me because of handicap parking and verbal and harassment. Why do you complain to the California Department Of Fair Housing. Commissioner Ernest M. Gross may need to scold and law The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects people with disabilities from discrimination. Small Corners, SDHC and ACE’S. I’m living here 1080 Park Blvd San Diego CA 92101. Three years of harassment. Commission Ernest M. Gross. character traits that make someone dangerous, untrustworthy, manipulative, annoying, abusive, or any other negative thing you can imagine.
I did a new 02/23/2023 Case# 22SC1630C and I mail SD-63 Dept exhibit 60 days court and form Disability Accommodation ADA Aphasia. Commissioner Ernest M. Gross cancel disability accommodation Aphasia bill of right. Why Commissioner Ernest M. Gross Intimidating and unfair, bias ,prejudice, corrupt in the new case# 22SC1630C.
Hearing Pro Judge Mark Abumeri 02/23/2023 case# 22SC1630C in SD-63 Commissioner Ernest M. Gross. I told Pro Judge Mark Abumeri Hearing because Commissioner Ernest M. Gross read my paper past and new cases. Pro Judge Mark Abumeri said in court SD 63 you cannot do new small claims. Pro Judge Mark Abumeri didn’t read my exhibit paper because Commissioner Ernest M. Gross finalize. California Rules of Court Rule 10.745
I moved to Florida because San Diego court Commissioner Micheal M. Gross and Pro Judge Mark Abumeri The State Bar of California Case Number 23-O-22905 | 23-O-23530 complained that The State Bar of California and Commission on Judicial Performance were biased and supported and encouraged disregard California and Federal law.
Corrupt and dishonest, Abuse at Law San Diego Superior Court - Department SD-63 commissioner Ernest M. Gross Disabilities Act (ADA) protects people with disabilities from discrimination. Investigation and health and enforcement California Department of Fair Housing. Unlawful ADA and discrimination Mobster Smart Corner Owners bully. San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC), San Diego Police, Civil Rights Two Judge’s unfair bias or prejudice, Intimidating, frightened laws San Diego California.
28 U.S. Code § 144 - Bias or Prejudice of Judge Code of Conduct for United States Judges.
California Rules of Court Rule 10.745
Case Number 23-O-22905 | 23-O-23530
Commission Ernest Micheal Gross #98998
and Pro Judge Mark Malek Abumeri #188349
Case Number 22SC00127C | 22SC1630C
-----------------------------------------
As previously advised, the California rules of court and the rules of the commission on judicial performance require that complaints about court commissioners and referees be handled first by the court that employs the officer. accordingly you should direct your complaint to the presiding judge of the county in question where the commissioner serves. you may wish to consider sending your complaint by some means such as certified mail, that will afford a record that it has been received. If you do not receive a response from the presiding or supervising judge within 90 days, you may contact us for assistance in determining the status of the local courts handling of your complaint.
Honorable Michael T. Smyth
San Diego County Superior Court
P.O.Box 122724
San Diego, CA 92112-2724
Small Claims Appeal
If you wish to appeal a small claims judgment, file your appeal with the small claims court location in which your trial was heard. Your appeal hearing (called a "trial de novo" which means new trial) will be heard in the Civil Division of the Superior Court. The Superior Court will notify you of the date to appear in court.
https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/sdcourt/appeals2/appealslookuptable/appealssmallclaims#:~:text=Smal
If you are notified by the local court of the disposition of your complaint and you are concerned that your complaint was not properly resolved, you may write back to us and request that the commission undertake an independent review of the matter. If you make such a request, please provide a copy of your complaint to the court, as well as a copy of the court’s response. Please be aware that if you wish further review by the commission a request for further review must be received by the commission within 30 days after the date of mailing of the local court’s notification of the disposition of your complaint.
State Bar of California Complaint. Please keep a record of your reference number: 218355
After your file has been reviewed by a CRU staff attorney, you will receive a letter explaining whether your complaint will remain closed or whether it will be returned to OCTC with a recommendation for further investigation. If CRU determines that your case should remain closed, it will explain the reasons for that decision and your right to seek review by the California Supreme Court.
We appreciate your patience while your file is being carefully reviewed. Estimated time for completion of your request may be eight months or more. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
Case Number 23-O-22905 | 23-O-23530
I didn’t want to close my complaint. (The state bar) We are closing your complaint.
.
Nov 24, 2023,
Tracking USPS 9505506630713328838626
Confidential under California Constitution Article VI, Section 18, and Commission Rule 102
Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 557-1200 Fax: (415) 557-1266
OFFICE OF CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL
845 S. Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017
March 04, 2024
The Superior Court of the State of California
Judge Marcella O, McLaughlin
Judge Katherine Bacal and Judge Maureen F. Hallahan
Your allegations against Commissioner Pro Tem Mark Abumeri are that he failed to review your exhibit papers and disregarded state and federal law. As a Commissioner Pro Tem, Mr. Abumeri is entitled to exercise his discretion with respect to the review and admission of evidence, as well as the interpretation of applicable law. During the hearing, Pro Tem Commissioner reviewed and discussed your exhibits with you. Consequently, we did not find evidence that Pro Tem Commissioner Abumeri engaged in prejudicial conduct or bias against
Your allegations against Commissioner Gross are numerous and serious. You accuse him of bias, or having the appearance of bias, and engaging in prejudicial conduct against you. You allege he was intimidating, and corrupt, and further, that he scolded you during the hearing and was abusive.
There is no evidence he engaged in prejudicial conduct against you. He listened to you throughout the hearing as you presented your case. At times he did interject to ask you questions. But he did not "scold" you about these or about your conduct during the trial. Commissioner Gross made appropriate inquiries of both sides and considered the evidence before making his decision.
"Corrupt Judge"
Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the judge's office to obtain special treatment...
"Ethical violations of a judge"
Common complaints of ethical misconduct include improper demeanour; failure to properly disqualify when the judge has a conflict of interest; engaging in ex parte communication and failure to execute their judicial duties in a timely fashion. Behaviour outside of the courtroom can also be at issue.
1.The law cannot tow car handicapped and a Misdemeanor.
2. Mayor hired commission San Diego Housing Commission government “laws handicapped”
3. SDHC Hud building and constructing Smart Corner. San Diego Housing Commission “ laws handicapped”
4. California fair housing laws “laws handicapped, Harassed and discrimination”
5.San Diego Housing Commision SDHC is a state-chartered government entity harassed Ada handicapped. “laws handicapped”
6. SDHC state-chartered government contract hired security harassed ADA “laws handicapped”
7. Mayor contract Ace’s San Diego Harassed ADA “laws handicapped”
9. San Diego Police not going to complain about towed car handicapped lawful. you need to court complain “misdemeanor”
10. A new suit sd-63 Ernest M. Gross , Pro Tem Mr. Abumeri cancelled my new suit
Bias/Appearance of Bias Toward a Particular Class, Demeanor/Decorum, On-Bench Abuse of Authority in Performance of Judicial Duties Rule 8.4 Misconduct
“Biased” (Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding.)
